H.R. 226 – African Elephant Conservation and Legal Ivory Possession Act [2017]

in House on January 17, 2017

Bill Description:
This bill amends the African Elephant Conservation Act of 1988 (AECA).[teaserbreak]

It clarifies what ivory can be imported/exported under the AECA and Endangered Species Act (ESA):
• Ivory that was legal to import on February 24, 2014, regardless of when it was acquired
• Worked ivory that was previously lawfully possessed in the U.S.
• Ivory for a museum

It gives the Secretary of the Interior authority to station one Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) law enforcement official in each African country with a significant elephant population, to assist local rangers in apprehending poachers.

It instructs the Secretary to report to the President when a country is found to be a significant transit or destination point for illegal ivory. This then enables the President to use the Pelly Amendment (to the Fishermen’s Protective Act) to impose sanction on nations that do not make adequate efforts to crack down on wildlife trafficking.

It specifies what ivory can be possessed, sold, delivered, received, shipped, or transported within the U.S.:
• Any ivory that has been lawfully imported or crafted in the U.S.

It clarifies that the AECA or ESA shall not be construed as authorizing any means of determining whether ivory has been lawfully imported, including any presumption or burden of proof applied in such determination, other than means used by the Secretary as of February 24, 2014. This places the burden of determining which ivory is and is not legal on the FWS.

It clarifies that the AECA or ESA shall not be construed as prohibiting anyone from importing a sport-hunted African elephant trophy, as long as the country has elephants that are listed on Appendix II of CITES. Trophy imports from Zimbabwe and Tanzania are currently prohibited, and this would end that prohibition for Zimbabwean elephants, which are listed on Appendix II.

In providing financial assistance under the AECA, the Secretary must give priority to projects designed to supply equipment and training to wildlife officials in ivory-producing countries, to be used in anti-poaching efforts.

Background:
This bill is, in part, an attack on the near-complete ban on commercial elephant ivory, which was implemented by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) in July, 2016. Read more about the actions taken by the FWS to stem the flow of ivory in the U.S here.

This newly implemented regulation was born out of President Obama’s National Strategy for Combating Wildlife Trafficking, announced in February, 2014. This ground-breaking policy finally gave the appropriate weight and urgency to the government’s responsibility to address the elephant poaching crisis, and mandated the necessary scope of actions to deal with it. If the new FWS policies are reversed or weakened by bills like this–that seek to go back to or even widen previously existing loopholes for importing and selling ivory–we would simply be moving back to square one, and elephants would not benefit from the international protection they require. All ivory trade increases the demand for ivory and encourages poaching, particularly because it is so difficult to distinguish old ivory from new.

Read more about devastating poaching crisis here.

Take Action:
Call or email your U.S. representative and urge him or her to oppose this legislation!

Read the full text and follow its progress here.

Read the next article

Are Zoos Helping or Hurting Elephant Health?