Inadequate care and facilities
Some facilities, known as “roadside zoos,” house animals in small, cramped cages completely divorced from the environmental and social conditions found in the wild. Other, larger facilities – those accredited by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) and other, similar associations – often attempt to replicate the animals’ natural habitats in relatively large, open-air enclosures that include natural elements such as grass and dirt (and, at times, opportunities for socialization and enrichment). While the conditions at roadside facilities are certainly far worse than in AZA-accredited facilities, even the “best” zoo setting can never recreate the complex environment that most species encounter in the wild or simulate all the stimuli which keep the animals active and alert.
In addition, no such setting can account for the family structure that exists in the wild. Like zoos, conditions in aquaria also pale in comparison to the richness, variety, and space of a life in the wild. Almost always in motion in the wild, cetaceans – whales and dolphins – spend only 20 percent or less of their time at the water’s surface. Captive facilities cannot compare to the vast natural environment of wild cetaceans and even the largest facilities are just a fraction of the size of the animals’ natural home range.
The 2013 documentary, Blackfish, revealed the devastating impact of captivity and exploitation on whales and dolphins. When denied adequate space, animals in zoos and aquariums often develop problems, such as abnormal repetitive behavior, aggression, and reduced life expectancy. Moreover, as animals in these facilities age and are no longer in prime “display” condition, the owners must make decisions as to the fate of the animals, which often ends tragically.